Lagniappe
Scott
Sullivan:
Morales's goal is regional sabotage
Most editorials
miss the point of Evo Morales's decision to nationalize
Bolivia's energy sector, just days after signing a trilateral socialist
trade pact (ALBA) with Cuba and Venezuela, countries that have little
to
offer Bolivia.
To most observers,
Morales's actions seem irrational because they will drive
away foreign investment and trade, as well as donor countries like the
United States. As a Los Angeles Times Editorial entitled "Unnatural
Disaster" puts it: "Evo Morales put his head in the oven and
turned on the
natural gas." (see below).
The truth may very
well be that creating a disaster is precisely what
Morales intends. He knows the risks of what he is doing and has decided
anyway to pauperize his country and declare economic war on Argentina
and
Brazil, the main importers of Bolivian gas. Morales is moving in th
direction of a policy that can please no one but his mentor and master
Hugo
Chaevz.
During the perilous
days of Germany's post WW I Weimar Republic, overturned
along with democracy by radical nationalist and race-oriented extremists
--
the Nazis -- in 1933, the Nazis had a clear plan to take power. Simply
put, the Nazi plan was to make Germany ungovernable, to the point where
the
German people, fed up with democracy and anarchy, would call on them
and
their Brownshirt methods. Hence the Nazi policy: "The worse the
better!"
Morales has this
Nazi plan in mind for Bolivia and the region, no doubt
incubated in discussions with Felipe Quispe, Bolivia's ultra-radical
Inca
nationalist. Not for them is falling into the "trap" of reform
and
cooperation with neighbors, international companies, and the UN agencies.
No, this is too prosaic, too slow, and not in the least heroic.
For Morales and
Quispe, Bolivia today -- like Germany in 1933 -- needs a
bold new path of racial unity and domestic confrontations, both to
consolidate power at home and open new revolutionary opportinities and
a
path to power and in the region. Why not extend the Inca Revolution
by
merginng Bolivia and Peru, as Morales now desires? Anarchy, the more
the
better.
So do not waste
time in looking for logic or the outlines of an economic
strategy in these moves by Morales. His goal, along witth Hugo Chavez
and
Felipe Quispe. is not to build the new but to destroy te old -- in a
word,
Sabotage!
Scott
Sullivan
0 5
07 06
Los Angeles Times
Editorial
Unnatural
disaster
May 6, 2006
BOLIVIAN
PRESIDENT EVO MORALES put his head in an oven this week and turned
on the natural gas. There are only two likely outcomes: an explosion
that
ends his political career - or a slow suffocation for his people.
Morales' decision to nationalize Bolivia's energy sector was hardly
unexpected; he was elected in December after promising to do just that.
But
it was a disappointment nonetheless to those who had hoped he'd follow
the
path of wiser South American politicians such as Brazilian President
Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva, whose leftist rhetoric keeps supporters happy
while
his more centrist policies keep the economy humming. Morales instead
is
running into the arms of Cuba's Fidel Castro and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez,
a
direction likely to impose a heavy cost on his impoverished nation of
9
million.
The problem with Bolivia is that it isn't Venezuela. The latter country
has gotten away with energy nationalization because it wields a lot
of
power. As the world's fifth-biggest oil exporter, Venezuela is such
a big
supplier that companies have little choice but to accede to its demands.
Bolivia has no such leverage. Its big resource is natural gas, which
is
harder to transport than oil, so typically it stays in local markets.
Most
of its gas exports go to Brazil, which recently discovered large domestic
reserves.
Foreign companies have long been wary about investing in Bolivia, especially
after the 2003 collapse of a project that should have assured a healthy
future for the country. Spanish and British oil companies had proposed
a
$5-billion pipeline to carry natural gas from landlocked Bolivia to
the
coast of Chile, where it would be liquefied and shipped to Mexico and
California. But the plan provoked furious protests in a Bolivian population
still angry at Chile for seizing what used to be Bolivia's coastline
in the
19th century. Morales helped lead the protest movement.
After investing $3.5 billion in Bolivia's natural gas industry, foreign
companies are now likely to stop investing entirely unless Morales backs
off
from his plan to seize 82% of gas production from the largest fields.
Their
loss would be disastrous for Bolivia because its state-owned gas company
is
in no position to extract and export the gas itself. Petrobras, Brazil's
state-owned energy company, has already suspended investment and said
it
will look for alternative supplies for Brazil.
Paying the price for Morales' rashness will be the people who elected
him,
and they can ill afford it; Bolivia is the poorest nation in South America.
It's true that the country's resources have long been exploited by
foreigners with little benefit to the indigenous population. But sending
in
the army to take over the gas fields isn't the answer to Bolivia's problems.
Scott
Sullivan is a former Washington goverment employee.
Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor
is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld
05/09/06
Copyright
©2006 Scott Sullivan. All Rights Reserved.