Anthony T Bryan :
T&T and regional energy diplomacy
During
the past few weeks, T&T’s development as an economy that
encourages foreign investment has been praised in international circles.
The
US Senate foreign relations committee on June 22, conducted hearings
on “Energy Security in Latin America,” and Luis E Giusti,
an internationally respected former president of Pdvsa (the Venezuelan
national oil company), praised T&T for the several successful
initiatives that have expanded its local gas industry as part of the
government strategy to promote industrialisation.
He
identified the country’s political stability, attractive geology
and proximity to the US, as factors in the support of high levels
of foreign direct investment. As he pointed out to the committee,
T&T (together with Nigeria) dominates the Atlantic LNG market.
Also
as reported on the Web site of the Financial Times, a study by the
US military’s Southern Command (South COM) in Miami expressed
concern about the spread of “resource nationalism” (the
new buzzword) in Latin America and the extension of state control
over energy production in several countries.
Current
trends toward the re-emergence of state control in Bolivia, seizures
of oilfields operated by multinationals in Bolivia and the doubling
of the level of taxes levied on oil production units operated by multinationals,
as well as the arbitrary management of the oil industry in Venezuela,
have sent up red flags in the US administration about US energy security.
The
report suggests that such actions may eventually deter the foreign
investment essential to increasing and sustaining oil and natural
gas output in the long term.
But
the Southern Command also indicated that: “An exception to the
trend is T&T whose policy of opening its doors to foreign investment
has allowed it to become the top supplier of LNG to the US.”
The
analysts warn that while the wave of resource nationalism in Latin
America is allowing governments to grab a greater share of the energy
price boom, tighter control will curb output in the future if, or
when, oil prices fall.
Given
the present course, the South COM study concludes that “the
prospects for long-term energy production in Venezuela, Ecuador and
Mexico are also at risk.”
The
right path
Without
a doubt, the most remarkable characteristics of T&T’s growth
as a petroleum economy, and recently as a natural gas economy, have
been the country’s democratic political stability:
n
the ability of successive governments to understand, drive and orchestrate
the technocratic human talent in the service of the energy sector;
n
government policies that have conferred a competitive advantage to
projects (while seeking a balance between the long-term benefits of
a potentially successful project with the concession needed to implement
the project); and
n
the consistent positive attitude towards foreign investment.
T&T’s
hydrocarbon resources and natural gas reserves have made it the most
industrialised country in the Caribbean.
Since
the 1970s the declared strategy has been to promote industrialisation
by expanding the local natural gas industry. Today, most of the inward
investment is directed toward the energy sector which now accounts
for about 70 per cent of the country’s exports.
Unlike
other oil producing nations, it is the only gas economy in the world
since, in terms of barrels of oil equivalent, gas production is more
than three times that of oil production.
The
making of energy policy has been quite visionary and, at times, deliberate
and consistent. All administrations have read from the same page.
The
institutions for upholding and enforcing international commitments
are strong and not politicised. Rarely has the politics of making
energy policy resulted in domestic strife.
On
occasion there was some political and civil disruption over ideology
that favored divestment of the petroleum sector. But the transition
in the 1980s from a state-centric to liberalised economy was embraced
by successive administrations that saw real benefits from embracing
the new ideology despite the obvious short-term social costs.
T&T
is being recognised by other energy rich countries as a model for
competitiveness, and the management of the balance that has to be
struck between (a) the incentives for exploration and the attraction
of foreign investment, and (b) the revenues that could be gained from
the exploration of natural resources.
Building
on energy diplomacy
Interestingly,
for T&T today, the current politics of regional energy cooperation
are spirited. T&T may be in the midst of an energy boom, but its
geopolitical and regional influence in the Caribbean is being challenged
in a manner that may at times require a pragmatic response and the
consistent use of significant political and diplomatic skill.
The
seismic shift in the energy world is affecting T&T. Theories of
peak oil and regional energy security aside, the three immediate concerns
for the country’s energy diplomacy are: the PetroCaribe agreement
and T&T’s relationship with its Caricom neighbours; cross
border co-operation with Venezuela and the changing energy landscape
in the United States.
PetroCaribe
There
is a diplomatic challenge posed by PetroCaribe. No doubt it will continue
to be an off-the-agenda item of discussion at Caricom Heads of Government
meetings including the current one in St Kitts/Nevis this week.
The
initial response of the Government to PetroCaribe was negative. Subsequently,
it has become accommodative.
To
his full credit, Prime Minister Manning at all times has been concerned
about T&T’s national interest, and also of the serious economic
circumstance of Caricom neighbours. But it is obvious that T&T
and its Caricom partners do not have as yet a clear vision of regional
energy cooperation or integration, though such a plan is at present
being drafted.
The
high profile of the Venezuelan initiatives, in which politics has
trumped economics, provides a lesson for T&T. Despite its strong
commitment to regional economic integration, the danger is that T&T’s
regional influence in diplomacy will wane considerably in the face
of Venezuela’s financial power and perceived largesse.
Similarly,
despite the attraction of PetroCaribe, Caricom leaders should look
beyond the immediate at a larger template for the region’s place
in international affairs.
The
Opposition leader in Jamaica has already warned the Prime Minister
of that country about “selling out the foreign policy interest
of this country (Jamaica) because of a few barrels of oil.”
And
the Venezuelan president has, on several occasions, characterised
oil as a political weapon. But would not a common approach by Caricom,
as envisioned in the formulation of a Caribbean energy policy, transform
PetroCaribe and the region’s relations with Venezuela, into
items that have less potential for politics to trump economics?
T&T/Venezuela
cross border co-operation
Given
Venezuela’s proximity to a well established LNG infrastructure
in T&T it may one day make sense for Plataforma Deltana gas to
be monetised in T&T.
The
MOU for unifying of cross border reserves indicates the willingness
of the two governments to work together to get the best out of their
respective oil and gas industries. However, there is a very long distance
between a government-to-government MOU and actual contractual terms
to supply gas across a border to an LNG project.
As
the Venezuelan LNG experience indicates, government-private company
negotiations can become protracted and agreements can be years in
the making.
Nevertheless,
if T&T is to expand its LNG business to include a fifth and sixth
trains, gas from Plataforma Deltana may play a critical role in making
this happen.
T&T
has enough natural gas for a fifth train but a sixth would require
some imports. However, if strained relations between the US and Venezuela
continue, such a supply using Venezuelan gas may be in doubt. Will
Venezuelan politics once more trump economics?
T&T
and the United States
With
just 0.3 per cent of the world’s proven natural gas reserves,
T&T has emerged at the head of the LNG export industry to the
US and is poised to play an even greater role in the global natural
gas industry in the coming years. Recent data suggests that US LNG
prices are very sensitive to large volume imports.
As
LNG imports grow, prices can be expected to decrease. The T&T
partners are aware of the downside risks associated with further expansion
in the LNG business. But what matters is getting the gas to market
before the competition, and T&T’s corporate partners have
so far led the way.
At
the moment T&T continues to negotiate with the United States and
LNG stakeholders from a position of strength as a key supplier, but
that could change as new national players emerge. Absent severe declines
in the market and prices, or catastrophic geopolitical events, can
T&T will be a player in the LNG game until at least 2020?
The
future path?
As
reported in the Business Guardian last week, Prime Minister Manning
stated that “we are indeed moving into a very exciting stage
in this country’s oil and gas development and in the country’s
social development.”
The
country has done very well so far in the global energy geopolitical
game. In order to stay the course, and to ensure continued long term
success, T&T should also embark on a structured regional, hemispheric
and global energy diplomacy that reflects constantly changing geopolitical
realities. There are roadmaps but no easy solutions.
Dr
Anthony T Bryan,
a Trinidadian scholar, is a senior associate of the Centre for Strategic
and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, DC and Professor Emeritus
at the University of Miami. He is a member of the project group at
CSIS that is studying regional energy co-operation in the western
hemisphere. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.